The Piltdown Hoax was a discovery of bone fragments (skull
and jawbone) that represented remains of an undiscovered early human. The
discoverer of the Piltdown Man was Charles Dawson, a British Archeologist. He
made this discovery East of Sussex England in a gravel pit, during the year of
1912. Throughout the time of the discovery, Dawson was praised, for it was the
“missing link” between humans and primates. This provided scientists and
anthropologists, such as Arthur Keith, proof of his theory about human
evolution. For the next decade, the Piltdown fossil was the backbone for all of
the research regarding evolution of humans. By 1920s scientists discovered
ancient remains in Asia and Africa. The new fossils were known to be hundreds
and thousands of years after the Piltdown man. And those skulls were less like
a human rather than Piltdown man’s more humanly structure. This is how they
theorized that Piltdown was a fraud. Later, as technology advanced, they were
able to discover that the Piltdown teeth and skull were shaven down so some
parts would look more human. They then realized it was just remains of a female
ape that was formed to look like human.
Human faults played a significant role in the process of
discovering the evolution of man. These faults consist of not testing and
properly analyzing what they are being handed. They should have known that
fossils are easy to tamper with and scientists should have checked their
research rather than being excited about a discovery. A human fault of theirs
was that they didn’t have more proof. If they wanted to see if the Piltdown man
was real, why didn’t they go out to the same area where Dawson found it and
continue to find more for more research? Instead they were excited to find the
“missing piece” that they were careless which risked them decades of faulty
information.
Scientists then started to use scientific processes that
proved the skull to be fraud. By measuring the fluorine content of fossils,
scientists can roughly date them. And according to video number 2, in 1949
scientists conducted this test on the Piltdown fossil and it showed that the
fossils were only a couple hundred thousand years old. Being the shape that it
is, those fossils would have to be millions of years old. In 1953, scientists developed
better dating methods and all the stains were superficial. Each cut seemed as
if it were cut by a steel knife and lastly the teeth were filed down to a
desired shape.
I believe removing the “human” factor in science will not do
anything. Science is always changing and there is always going to be errors
within the practice. If anything, I would remove the pride of the work. Every
scientist wants to be the one that discovers something new and something that
changes the world. Without this pride, science would leap in far better
directions because it gets rid of the competition aspect. Usually the
competition aspect may make science better because scientists are motivated by
it, but like the Piltdown case, scientists may be held back decades of research.
This precious time may have been used for more modern research and our
generation could have evolved to better species in that time wasted.
The life lesson that I got from this is not to believe
everything that people say is true without the proper research. It is easy to
believe a lie, but after living your whole entire life believing that lie, it
is hard to go back and believe the truth. Before believing something, it is
best to do your own research and look up proper sources rather than believing
one opinion or one statement.